Knowing Your Family in Heaven · Lesson 4 of 6

What the Fathers Hoped

The Deuterocanon and Pseudepigrapha: the world behind Luke 16, and the answer nobody wants

Between Malachi and Matthew, Jewish writers argued this exact question out loud — and the New Testament was written to people who had heard them. A reader who has never met 2 Maccabees, 1 Enoch or 2 Baruch will miss what the first readers caught.

This lesson is the world behind Luke 16 and behind “Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.”

A note on the non-canonical writings. This lesson quotes writings that are not Scripture — the Deuterocanon (Apocrypha) and the Pseudepigrapha. Pleasant Springs cites them as witnesses to the world the biblical writers lived in, never as a basis for doctrine. Each is tagged where it appears. We show them because a reader will meet them eventually and should meet them here first, correctly labelled.
And they disagree with each other, which is itself instructive. Ben Sira has almost no afterlife hope; 2 Maccabees has a bodily resurrection; 4 Maccabees has an immortal soul; 2 Baruch has both, in sequence. We report the disagreement rather than flattening it into a single “Jewish view.”
A Mother Told She Will Get Her Sons Back
author

An abridgement — the author says so (2:23) — of a lost five-volume history by Jason of Cyrene. Composed in Greek, not translated from Hebrew.

date

Late second or early first century BC.

audience

Diaspora Jews, and specifically Egyptian Jewry: the book is prefaced by letters from Jerusalem to the Jews in Egypt.

occasion

The persecution under Antiochus IV. Chapter 7 tells of a mother and seven sons tortured to death for refusing to eat pork.

2 Maccabees 7:9 (non-canonical)

ἐν ἐσχάτῃ δὲ πνοῇ γενόμενος εἶπεν σὺ μέν ἀλάστωρ ἐκ τοῦ παρόντος ἡμᾶς ζῆν ἀπολύεις ὁ δὲ τοῦ κόσμου βασιλεὺς ἀποθανόντας ἡμᾶς ὑπὲρ τῶν αὐτοῦ νόμων εἰς αἰώνιον ἀναβίωσιν ζωῆς ἡμᾶς ἀναστήσει

Working rendering from the Greek

“But the King of the world will raise us up, who have died for his laws, to an everlasting renewal of life.”

2 Maccabees 7:23 (non-canonical)

τοιγαροῦν ὁ τοῦ κόσμου κτίστης ὁ πλάσας ἀνθρώπου γένεσιν καὶ πάντων ἐξευρὼν γένεσιν καὶ τὸ πνεῦμα καὶ τὴν ζωὴν ὑμῖν πάλιν ἀποδίδωσιν μετ' ἐλέους ὡς νῦν ὑπερορᾶτε ἑαυτοὺς διὰ τοὺς αὐτοῦ νόμους

Working rendering from the Greek

“Therefore the Creator of the world… will in his mercy give back to you again both breath and life.”

And then the sentence this series exists for. The mother, urging her youngest and last son not to give in:

2 Maccabees 7:29 (non-canonical)

μὴ φοβηθῇς τὸν δήμιον τοῦτον ἀλλὰ τῶν ἀδελφῶν ἄξιος γενόμενος ἐπίδεξαι τὸν θάνατον ἵνα ἐν τῷ ἐλέει σὺν τοῖς ἀδελφοῖς σου κομίσωμαί σε

Working rendering from the Greek

“Do not fear this butcher, but prove worthy of your brothers and accept death, so that in the mercy I may get you back together with your brothers.”

κομίζομαιkomizomai

To recover; to receive back what is one’s own. It is the word for retrieving property or reclaiming a deposit. A mother watching her seventh son die says she expects to get him back — and to get him back with his brothers. So far as we can find, this is the earliest explicit statement in Jewish literature that resurrection means a family restored to each other by name.

Two further texts from the same book, reported because they are there. 2 Maccabees 12:38–45 records Judas collecting money for a sin offering for fallen soldiers; 15:12–16 shows the dead high priest Onias and the prophet Jeremiah appearing and praying for the people. These two passages are the historic basis of the Roman Catholic doctrines of prayer for the dead and the intercession of the saints, and a principal reason the Reformers excluded the book from the canon. Pleasant Springs does not teach either doctrine and does not build on these passages. We show them because a reader will meet them, and should meet them here first, correctly labelled, rather than be ambushed.
“Abraham and Isaac and Jacob Will Welcome Us”
author

An anonymous Hellenistic Jewish homily in polished Greek.

date

Probably first century AD — roughly contemporary with the New Testament.

audience

Greek-speaking diaspora Jews, possibly at Antioch, formed by Stoic moral vocabulary.

occasion

It retells the martyrdoms of 2 Maccabees 6–7 to prove a thesis stated in its first line: that devout reason is master of the passions.

Note the doctrinal difference from 2 Maccabees, and we will not paper over it: 4 Maccabees has no bodily resurrection. Its hope is the immortality of the soul. Same martyrs, different afterlife. This is exactly why these books cannot be treated as one voice.

4 Maccabees 13:17 (non-canonical)

οὕτω γὰρ θανόντας ἡμᾶς Αβρααμ καὶ Ισαακ καὶ Ιακωβ ὑποδέξονται καὶ πάντες οἱ πατέρες ἐπαινέσουσιν

Working rendering from the Greek

“For if we die thus, Abraham and Isaac and Jacob will welcome us, and all the fathers will praise us.”

ὑποδέχομαιhypodechomai

The word for receiving a guest into your house — it is what Martha does for Jesus at Luke 10:38. The brothers expect to be shown in.

4 Maccabees 18:23 (non-canonical)

οἱ δὲ Αβραμιαῖοι παῖδες σὺν τῇ ἀθλοφόρῳ μητρὶ εἰς πατέρων χορὸν συναγελάζονται ψυχὰς ἁγνὰς καὶ ἀθανάτους ἀπειληφότες παρὰ τοῦ θεοῦ

Working rendering from the Greek

“But the sons of Abraham, with their prize-winning mother, are gathered together into the chorus of the fathers, having received pure and immortal souls from God.”

That answers our question as directly as any ancient text does: the seven brothers and their mother are together, and they are added to the company of the ancestors. The family is not merely preserved; it is enlarged into the older family it came from.

Three More Witnesses, Disagreeing

Wisdom of Solomon — anonymous, written pseudonymously as Solomon, in accomplished Greek, almost certainly Alexandria, first century BC, for diaspora Jews under pressure to assimilate. Its opening chapters answer the taunt that the righteous die like anyone else and nothing follows.

Wisdom 3:1–3 (non-canonical)

δικαίων δὲ ψυχαὶ ἐν χειρὶ θεοῦ καὶ οὐ μὴ ἅψηται αὐτῶν βάσανος ἔδοξαν ἐν ὀφθαλμοῖς ἀφρόνων τεθνάναι καὶ ἐλογίσθη κάκωσις ἡ ἔξοδος αὐτῶν καὶ ἡ ἀφ' ἡμῶν πορεία σύντριμμα οἱ δέ εἰσιν ἐν εἰρήνῃ

Working rendering from the Greek

“But the souls of the righteous are in the hand of God, and no torment will ever touch them. In the eyes of the foolish they seemed to have died… but they are at peace.”

This is the text most often read at Christian funerals that is not in the Protestant Bible, and the reason is its pastoral precision: “in the eyes of the foolish they seemed to have died.” It does not deny the death. It denies the appearance of what the death meant. Note that Wisdom, like 4 Maccabees, thinks in souls rather than raised bodies.

Sirach — Jeshua ben Eleazar ben Sira, a Jerusalem scribe, writing in Hebrew about 180 BC; translated into Greek in Egypt by his grandson after 132 BC, who says so in a prologue — one of the very few ancient translator’s prefaces we possess.

Sirach 44:14 (non-canonical)

τὰ σώματα αὐτῶν ἐν εἰρήνῃ ἐτάφη καὶ τὸ ὄνομα αὐτῶν ζῇ εἰς γενεάς

Working rendering from the Greek

“Their bodies were buried in peace, and their name lives to all generations.”

This is the outlier, and it is important. Ben Sira’s famous “Praise of the Fathers” (chs. 44–50) runs through Israel’s ancestors by name — and its hope for them is memory and posterity, not resurrection. He is a witness that as late as 180 BC a thoroughly devout Jerusalem teacher could still have essentially no doctrine of personal afterlife. We include him because leaving him out would make the Second Temple period look like a straight line to Easter. It was not. And there is pastoral value in his position too: a name and a line are a real form of continuance, even though he did not yet know the better thing.

Tobit — a diaspora novella, probably third or second century BC, set in the Assyrian exile, for Jews living far from Jerusalem, marrying, working and burying their dead among foreigners. Tobit’s whole crisis begins because he buries the dead when it is forbidden.

Textual note. Tobit survives in two substantially different Greek recensions — the shorter BA (Vaticanus/Alexandrinus) and the longer S (Sinaiticus) — and Aramaic and Hebrew fragments from Qumran support the longer form. We print both.

Tobit 4:4 — recension BA (non-canonical)

μνήσθητι παιδίον ὅτι πολλοὺς κινδύνους ἑόρακεν ἐπὶ σοὶ ἐν τῇ κοιλίᾳ ὅταν ἀποθάνῃ θάψον αὐτὴν παρ' ἐμοὶ ἐν ἑνὶ τάφῳ

Tobit 4:4 — recension S (non-canonical)

μνήσθητι αὐτῆς παιδίον ὅτι κινδύνους πολλοὺς ἑώρακεν ἐπὶ σοὶ ἐν τῇ κοιλίᾳ αὐτῆς καὶ ὅταν ἀποθάνῃ θάψον αὐτὴν παρ' ἐμοὶ ἐν ἑνὶ τάφῳ

“Remember, my child, that she faced many dangers for you while you were in her womb. And when she dies, bury her beside me in one grave.”

The two recensions differ in wording through the surrounding verses, and are word-for-word identical in the clause that matters. Tobit has no developed afterlife theology at all. What it has is a conviction, expressed as a deathbed request, that husband and wife and parents and children belong together. It is a witness not to doctrine but to instinct — the same instinct behind Abraham buying a cave in Genesis 23, and behind every family plot in our own cemetery.
The Compartments of the Dead — and Luke 16
author

1 Enoch is a composite of at least five works. Chapter 22 belongs to the Book of the Watchers (chs. 1–36), the oldest stratum.

date

Third century BC; Aramaic fragments were found at Qumran.

audience

Jewish readers fascinated and troubled by the origin of evil and the fate of the dead.

Jude 14–15 quotes 1 Enoch 1:9 by name — which is why no Christian can pretend the book was unknown to the New Testament’s authors, and why Pleasant Springs shows it rather than hides it.
1 Enoch 22:3–4 (non-canonical)R. H. Charles, 1913

“These hollow places have been created for this very purpose, that the spirits of the souls of the dead should assemble therein… And these places have been made to receive them till the day of their judgement and till their appointed period.”

1 Enoch 22:5–7 (non-canonical)R. H. Charles, 1913

“I saw the spirits of the children of men who were dead, and their voice went forth to heaven and made suit… ‘This is the spirit which went forth from Abel, whom his brother Cain slew.’”

The chapter goes on to divide the hollow places — a bright spring of water for the spirits of the righteous, and separate places of pain for sinners, each held until the great judgement.

Why this matters for reading Luke 16. The rich man and Lazarus is told against exactly this furniture: the dead separated into compartments, conscious, able to speak, awaiting a judgement still to come, and a great gulf between the divisions. Jesus’ first hearers did not need the scenery explained. This does not make 1 Enoch true. It makes Luke 16 a parable told in a known idiom — a reason for caution about mining it for a literal map, not a reason to take Enoch’s map as one.

And note Abel. The first murdered man’s spirit “makes suit” against his brother — a development of Genesis 4:10, and the nearest ancient parallel to the souls under the altar crying “how long?” in Revelation 6:10. The earliest picture of a conscious dead person in this literature is a murdered man asking about his brother.

The Text That Asks Our Exact Question
author

2 Baruch, the Syriac Apocalypse of Baruch.

date

After the destruction of the temple in AD 70, probably around the turn of the second century.

place

Survives complete only in Syriac, translated from Greek, probably from a Hebrew original.

audience

Jews devastated by the fall of Jerusalem, asking why the righteous suffer and what is left.

And Baruch asks the question this series is named for — not a vague question about heaven, but a precise question about form and recognisability:

2 Baruch 49:2–3 (non-canonical)R. H. Charles, 1913

“In what shape will those live who live in Your day? Or how will the splendour of those who (are) after that time continue? Will they then resume this form of the present, and put on these entrammelling members…?”

The answer comes in two stages, and the order is the whole point.

2 Baruch 50:2 — stage one, raised unchangedR. H. Charles, 1913

“For the earth shall then assuredly restore the dead… It shall make no change in their form, but as it has received, so shall it restore them, and as I delivered them unto it, so also shall it raise them.”

2 Baruch 50:3–4 — so that they can be knownR. H. Charles, 1913

“For then it will be necessary to show the living that the dead have come to life again… And it shall come to pass, when they have severally recognized those whom they now know, then judgment shall grow strong.”

2 Baruch 51:3, 51:10 — stage two, and only then transformedR. H. Charles, 1913

“…then their splendour shall be glorified in changes, and the form of their face shall be turned into the light of their beauty… and they shall be made like unto the angels, and be made equal to the stars.”

This is the most direct answer to our question anywhere in ancient Jewish literature, and it is not Scripture. But look at what it does. It sees the problem exactly — if the dead are glorified beyond recognition, the reunion is a reunion with strangers — and it solves it with a sequence: the dead are raised first in their own recognisable form, so that they recognise those whom they now know, and the transformation into splendour comes after.

Pleasant Springs does not teach 2 Baruch’s timetable. We have no canonical warrant for a two-stage resurrection of that shape. But we note, honestly, that a Jewish writer within a generation of the New Testament thought the recognition of the dead by their families was so important that God would arrange the order of the resurrection around it. That tells you what the question felt like to people living then — and it is the same thing a widow asks a pastor now.
And the Answer Nobody Wants
author

4 Ezra (= 2 Esdras 3–14 in English Apocrypha), a Jewish apocalypse.

date

After AD 70, about AD 100 — the same devastation that produced 2 Baruch.

audience

Jews asking how a righteous God could allow Zion to fall to a more wicked nation.

occasion

Ezra — set in the Babylonian exile, speaking for readers in the Roman one — argues with the angel Uriel, and will not be easily comforted.

Textual note worth having. The section below, 7:36–105, is the famous “Missing Fragment.” It had dropped out of the Latin manuscripts behind the King James Apocrypha and was not recovered until 1875. A reader with an older Apocrypha will not find these verses.

Chapter 7 first describes seven orders of torment for the ungodly and seven orders of rest and joy for the righteous after death (7:78–99). Then Ezra asks the question every grieving believer eventually asks:

4 Ezra 7:102–103 (non-canonical)Revised Version with Apocrypha, 1895

…whether in the day of judgment the just will be able to intercede for the ungodly… whether fathers for children, or children for parents, or brethren for brethren, or kinsfolk for their next of kin, or friends for them that are most dear.

Read that list again. It is a list of families. Ezra is not asking an abstract question about intercession. He is asking whether a father can plead for his son.

4 Ezra 7:104–105 — the answerRevised Version with Apocrypha, 1895

“The day of judgement is a day of decision, and displayeth unto all the seal of truth” — no one shall pray for another in that day, for “all bear every one his own righteousness or unrighteousness.”

Why we print this. 4 Ezra is not Scripture and we do not teach it. We print it because it is the most honest ancient statement of the problem, and because its logic is echoed in Scripture at Ezekiel 18:20 and Deuteronomy 24:16 — the soul who sins shall die; each bears his own. And the apocalypse adds a mercy the church can keep: the reason intercession works now is that now is not the end (7:112–115). That is an argument for praying for your family today, with everything you have.
For Discussion
1.These writings are not Scripture. What is the right way to use them — and what would misusing them look like?
2.The mother in 2 Maccabees says she will “get you back with your brothers.” Does it change anything to know a Jewish mother said that 150 years before Christ?
3.Ben Sira — a devout teacher in 180 BC — hoped only that the name would live. How would you have comforted him?
4.2 Baruch says God raises the dead unchanged first, so they can be recognised. Why do you think that mattered so much to him?
5.4 Ezra says no one can plead for another on that day. What should we do with that, now, this week?

Pleasant Springs Church — Discipleship School