Two Ways to Know the Word of God
A Discipleship-School study — Septuagint (LXX) and ESV
A lawyer once asked Jesus what he had to do to inherit eternal life. Jesus answered him with two questions, and the second one is the whole of this lesson: “What is written in the Law? How do you read?” Not what do you read. Not how much. How. Two men can open the same scroll to the same verse and get the same words letter-perfect, and one of them walks away known by God and the other walks away justifying himself. This study separates those two ways of knowing the Word — and then answers the person who has concluded, from watching the first kind, that learning is not really part of following Jesus.
Begin where the accusation is sharpest, and notice what Jesus does not say. He is speaking to men who have given their lives to the Scriptures. He does not tell them they have read too much.
Read that slowly, because almost everyone quotes it wrongly. Jesus does not say the Scriptures are worthless, or that searching them was a waste, or that they were mistaken to expect life there. He says the Scriptures are the witnesses to Him — “it is they that bear witness about me.” The text was doing its job perfectly. The men were the ones who stopped early. They arrived at the signpost, read it with immense care, and made camp under it.
That is the Pharisee’s knowing in one sentence: the Word held as a possession rather than travelled as a road. And it produces a recognisable set of habits.
The Word as possession
- I read to have the text — to hold it, cite it, win with it.
- My learning is a credential. It marks me off from people who have less.
- I bring the passage to my position and ask what it will do for me.
- Difficulty is a threat, so I hide the parts that do not fit.
- The measure of a good study is that I was right.
- I read the Word. Nothing reads me.
The Word as door
- I read to meet Someone — the text is a witness, not a destination.
- My learning is a debt. It puts me under what I now know.
- I bring myself to the passage and ask what it will do to me.
- Difficulty is an invitation, so I name what I cannot yet explain.
- The measure of a good study is that I was changed.
- I read the Word, and the Word reads me.
And yet — hold this next fact against the temptation to despise them. When Jesus opens His most withering chapter against the scribes and Pharisees, He begins by telling the crowds to do what they say.
Their content was largely sound. Jesus attacks the fracture between what they knew and what they were. He says the same thing again about their scrupulous tithing of garden herbs — and the sentence people always leave off is the important one:
Now the other side. Why can a person not begin to be known by God without the Word? Because in Scripture, being known by God is a covenant relationship, and covenants are made of words. God has bound Himself to make Himself available by speech. Remove the speech and you have not got a purer religion; you have got silence, and then you have got whatever you happen to imagine.
Paul makes the chain explicit and runs it backwards until it terminates in a word being spoken:
The Shepherd says the same thing from the other end. His sheep are identified not by a feeling but by a recognition — and you cannot recognise a voice you have never heard:
And notice where the accent finally falls. The goal of all this is not the size of your knowledge. Paul catches himself mid-sentence to say so:
Here is the verse that should decide this argument for anyone who thinks study is the danger. The most frightening sentence in the Gospels is not addressed to scholars. It is addressed to people with a ministry résumé.
Look at the résumé they read out: prophecy, deliverance, mighty works. Not one line of it is study. These are the most active, most demonstrative, most obviously Spirit-credentialled people in the room — and the verdict falls on them anyway. So “I never knew you” is not a warning against learning. It is a warning against being unknown, and a busy man can be unknown just as thoroughly as a bookish one. The Pharisee and the activist arrive at the same door by opposite roads.
If anyone still suspects that the answer to misused Bible knowledge is less Bible knowledge, the wilderness settles it. In Matthew 4 the devil quotes Scripture at Jesus — and he quotes it almost perfectly. We compared his citation word-for-word against the Greek Old Testament on our own shelf. Here is exactly what he did.
He kept every word but one clause
Matthew 4:6 against Psalm 91:11–12 · LXX Psalm 90:11–12
This is the Psalm as the Greek Old Testament has it. The words the devil kept are in white; the clause he cut out is struck through:
ὅτι τοῖς ἀγγέλοις αὐτοῦ ἐντελεῖται περὶ σοῦ τοῦ διαφυλάξαι σε ἐν πάσαις ταῖς ὁδοῖς σου ἐπὶ χειρῶν ἀροῦσίν σε μήποτε προσκόψῃς πρὸς λίθον τὸν πόδα σου
The excised clause is “to guard you in all your ways” — and it is the one clause that would have destroyed his argument. The angels are promised to guard you in your ways: the paths God has actually set you walking. They are not promised to catch you when you jump off a building to make a point. He did not misquote a single word. He edited out the qualifier.
He then papered over the seam. Where the Psalm runs “…concerning you, to guard you in all your ways, upon their hands…”, his version reads “…concerning you, and upon their hands…” — a single inserted καί closing the gap where the missing line used to be.
And how did Jesus answer? Not by abandoning the text. By quoting Deuteronomy back at him — three times, in Greek that tracks the Septuagint almost word for word. Against Matthew 4:4 our shelf measures a five-word unbroken run shared with LXX Deuteronomy 8:3: ἄρτῳ μόνῳ ζήσεται ὁ ἄνθρωπος.
The cure for Scripture handled badly was never Scripture handled less. It was Scripture handled better, by a man who had it in Him.
Measured against MorphGNT/SBLGNT and CATSS Rahlfs on 20 August 2026. Reproduce with build_and_deploy.py --verify.Here is a measurable fact that should end the debate on its own. The Shema, as Moses gave it, names three faculties. We checked the Hebrew and the Greek on our own shelf, and both have three.
Now count the faculties in the Gospels every time that commandment is quoted. We pulled all four citations from the Greek New Testament:
| Where | Faculties named, in order | Count |
|---|---|---|
| Deuteronomy 6:5 — Hebrew (MT) | heart · soul · might | 3 |
| Deuteronomy 6:5 — Greek (LXX) | καρδίας · ψυχῆς · δυνάμεως | 3 |
| Mark 12:30 | καρδίας · ψυχῆς · διανοίας · ἰσχύος | 4 |
| Luke 10:27 | καρδίας · ψυχῇ · ἰσχύϊ · διανοίᾳ | 4 |
| Matthew 22:37 | καρδίᾳ · ψυχῇ · διανοίᾳ | 3 |
Jesus’ last recorded instruction to the eleven settles the question of whether learning is optional, because it commands the church to teach — and you cannot teach what you have not learned.
Take that final clause apart, because both errors die inside it.
| Greek | Force | Which error it kills |
|---|---|---|
| μαθητεύσατε make disciples | The one imperative in the sentence. A mathētēs is a learner — the noun is built on μανθάνω, to learn. | “I’m a disciple, but learning isn’t my thing.” That is “I’m a learner but I don’t learn.” |
| διδάσκοντες teaching | How disciples get made. Content must be transmitted, therefore content must be held. | The anti-study position — it cannot obey this clause at all. |
| τηρεῖν to observe, to keep | The purpose of the teaching. Not to inform — to be kept. | The Pharisee’s position — he teaches for mastery, not for keeping. |
| πάντα ὅσα all things whatsoever | No permitted subset. The whole deposit. | “I know the parts I need.” The commission does not offer a short version. |
This section is written plainly and on purpose, because it is the part most often gotten wrong — and gotten wrong by sincere people who are trying to avoid hypocrisy.
The road has two ditches, not one.
Everyone knows about the first ditch. That is the Pharisee: a man who knows the Book and does not know God. We have all met him. Some of us have been him. The warning is real and Jesus gave it hard.
But when people get scared of the first ditch, they often steer so hard away from it that they drive straight into the second one. The second ditch is this: teaching people not to learn.
It rarely gets said that plainly. It usually comes out gentler:
“All that studying is head knowledge. I just love Jesus.”
“The Pharisees knew the most Scripture of anybody, and look at them.”
“You don’t need doctrine, you need relationship.”
Every one of those sentences sounds humble. Every one of them is a way of excusing yourself from something Jesus commanded. And here is how you can tell: a real correction makes you obey more, not less. If a correction ends with you doing less of what Christ told you to do, and feeling better about it, that is not humility. That is an alibi with a Bible verse stapled to it.
Overcorrecting is just the same sin from the other side.
The Pharisee’s actual sin was not knowledge. It was using his religion to stay in charge of himself. He used study to avoid surrender.
Now watch the man who refuses to study. What is he doing? He is using his suspicion of study to avoid the same thing. He does not have to be corrected by a text he never reads. He does not have to change his mind, because he never puts it where it could be changed. He has found a way to keep control too — he just found a cheaper one.
Two men, one sin. One hides behind what he knows. The other hides behind what he refuses to know. Neither is being handled by God.
Jesus never fixed anybody by telling them to know less.
Go looking for it. It is not there.
When the Sadducees got the resurrection wrong, He said, “You are wrong because you know neither the Scriptures nor the power of God” (Matthew 22:29). Their problem was ignorance, and He said so to their faces.
When the Pharisees tithed herbs and skipped justice, He said do the weighty things “without neglecting the others” (Matthew 23:23). He added; He did not subtract.
When the devil misused a Psalm, Jesus answered with three more passages (Matthew 4:4, 7, 10).
When two disciples were slow of heart, He did not tell them to stop thinking about it. He gave them a Bible study that ran from Moses through all the Prophets (Luke 24:27) — and their hearts burned.
Every single time, the remedy runs toward the text, not away from it.
So what do you say instead?
You do not have to choose between warning about pride and calling people to learn. Say both. Here is the swap:
Say: “Go deep, and take somebody with you. Knowledge that is being given away has a hard time puffing up.”
Say: “What are you going to do with that this week?” — which is the actual cure, and it does not cost anyone a single verse.
Say: “Everything you know about the Person you are in relationship with, you got from a sentence somebody taught you.”
Say: “Look what happened to Paul.” — He was a Pharisee of Pharisees, and he did not fix it by forgetting his training. He re-aimed it.
One test you can carry in your pocket.
Before you correct anyone about Bible study — including yourself — ask this:
“Does this correction send them back to the Word with a different aim, or does it just send them away from it?”
If it sends them back with a new aim, it is Jesus’ kind of correction. If it sends them away, you have not saved them from the Pharisee. You have only made sure they will never find out what he knew.
Four texts get used to argue that study is unnecessary. Each of them says something true. None of them says that.
| The verse | What it is actually doing |
|---|---|
| “Knowledge puffs up” 1 Corinthians 8:1 |
Written by the most theologically trained man in the New Testament, in a letter packed with argument. And read the very next sentence: the remedy Paul names is love (ἡ δὲ ἀγάπη οἰκοδομεῖ), and two verses later the goal is being known by God. He prescribes a different aim for knowledge, never less of it. The context is meat offered to idols — a man wielding a correct fact to wound a weaker brother. |
| “The letter kills” 2 Corinthians 3:6 |
γράμμα here is the old covenant administration carved on stone, set against the new covenant ministry of the Spirit — Paul says so in the same breath (“ministers of a new covenant, not of the letter but of the Spirit”). It is a contrast between two covenants, not between careful reading and careless reading. Using it to mean “don’t study the words too closely” requires ignoring the words closely. |
| “You have no need that anyone should teach you” 1 John 2:27 |
John is writing against deceivers who claimed the believers needed their special initiation (2:26 — “those who are trying to deceive you”). He is saying: you already have the anointing, you do not need their new revelation. And he is saying it in a letter written to teach them. If the verse meant what it is used to mean, it would abolish itself in the act of being read. |
| “Become like children” Matthew 18:3 |
Children are the model for dependence and low status — the disciples had just asked who was greatest. Children are not the model for incuriosity. In fact a child is the most relentless learner in any household. Israel was commanded to teach these words to children constantly (Deuteronomy 6:7), which would be an odd command if childlikeness meant not learning. |
And set against them, the plain testimony runs the other way:
If the answer to Pharisaism were ignorance, God would not have built the New Testament’s theology through a man trained at the feet of Gamaliel. Paul is the living proof that the fault was never the education.
And at the very end of his life, chained, having been caught up to the third heaven, having written most of the letters we now study — what does he ask for?
Scripture’s own picture for right knowing is not the study carrel. It is a meal. You do not master food; you let it become you.
And this is precisely what God promised to do in the new covenant — note carefully how the Hebrew and the Greek each put it, because they are not identical:
So the practices below are not a programme for advanced Christians. They are how a person gets the Word inside, where being known happens.
Before you open it, say so out loud: “Search me while I search this.” The single difference between the two knowings is which of you is holding the knife (Hebrews 4:12). Settle that in the first ten seconds and the whole hour changes.
Hebrew hagah (Psalm 1:2, Joshua 1:8) and Greek μελετήσει both mean something closer to muttering than to skimming — turning a phrase over in the mouth. Volume is not the goal. A paragraph chewed beats a chapter swallowed.
“I have hidden your word in my heart” is not sentiment; it is logistics. In the wilderness Jesus met the enemy with Deuteronomy He already had in Him — nobody handed Him a scroll. What you have not stored, you cannot draw.
James calls the man who hears and does not act a man who looks in a mirror and forgets his face (James 1:22–25). Unobeyed light does not stay light; it hardens. This is also the honest cure for pride — not knowing less, but immediately owing more.
The Bereans examined the Scriptures daily together (Acts 17:11), and Paul says the word of Christ dwells richly where people are “teaching and admonishing one another” (Colossians 3:16). Knowledge that is constantly being handed to someone else has a hard time inflating. This is Matthew 28:20 in ordinary clothes.
When the text will not open, that is the moment the two roads part. The Pharisee resolves the tension in favour of his position. The disciple takes the unresolved thing to the Person the text is testifying about — which is exactly what John 5:39–40 says the Pharisees would not do.
On the road to Emmaus, Jesus gave two men the longest Bible study in the Gospels — Moses, then all the Prophets, then all the Scriptures. It was, by any measure, an academic exercise: texts, in order, expounded. And here is what it produced.
Same scrolls the Pharisees had. Same verses. Same careful exposition, in order, at length. The difference was that the One the text was about was present, and they let Him do the opening. That is the whole distinction this study has been drawing, and here it is in one afternoon on a road: exegesis and burning hearts are not rivals. They were the same event.
Ἰουδαίους· Ἐὰν ὑμεῖς μείνητε ἐν τῷ λόγῳ τῷ ἐμῷ, ἀληθῶς μαθηταί μού ἐστε,John 8:31–32 · Greek and ESV
Abide — μείνητε. Not visit. Not master. Stay there, until you are the one being known.
Text and Translation — What We CheckedDifferences between the Hebrew and the Greek are disclosed, not smoothed:
- Hosea 4:6 — MT nidmu (“are destroyed”, so ESV) vs. LXX ὡμοιώθη (“have become like”). Same consonants, two possible roots.
- Jeremiah 31:33 / LXX 38:33 — MT “my law (sing.) within them” vs. LXX “my laws (pl.) into their mind”. Hebrews 8:10 follows the Greek.
- Deuteronomy 6:5 — three faculties in both MT and the LXX we print; διάνοια in the Gospel citations is the Gospels’ own.
Pleasant Springs Church — Discipleship School
Scripture set in the Septuagint (LXX) / Greek and the ESV per the practice of Pleasant Springs Church. Greek New Testament from MorphGNT/SBLGNT; Greek Old Testament from CATSS (Rahlfs); Hebrew from the Masoretic text. The language of discipleship as apprenticeship follows Dallas Willard (1935–2013).
|
Did this study bless you today? 💚 Give to Support PS Church100% of gifts go to the General Fund — thank you. |